Abbas Salehi - Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance (MCIG) - Censorship and Sanctions: Should the US Sanction Iran’s Minister of Culture?

Censorship and Sanctions: Should the US Sanction Iran’s Minister of Culture?

This past April, the Iranian regime announced an ostensible concession to the country’s beleaguered, long-censored journalists: Tehran would offer 100 of them unrestricted internet access. But there was a catch: The Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance (MCIG) would need to vet all candidates for loyalty to the regime’s Islamist ideology. Multiple Iranian journalists quickly called out the charade on Twitter. One described the proposal as “favoritism and hush money.” Another declared that access to cyberspace “is a right, not a favor.” Several said they would not apply, using the hashtag “I’m not interested.”

This story is hardly unusual. Since the 1980s, the MCIG has played a leading role in suppressing political and cultural speech that contradicts Tehran’s revolutionary creed. But while the Obama administration sanctioned the ministry in 2012 for engaging in censorship, its current leadership has escaped Washington’s attention. By sanctioning the ministry’s current head, Abbas Salehi, Washington can send the mullahs a message that their ideologically driven repression will carry a price.

According to its website, the MCIG seeks the protection of “society from influence of alien cultures” and the promotion of the “values of the Islamic Revolution based on the school of thought and political outlook” of Iran’s first supreme leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. To advance these objectives, the MCIG ruthlessly vets books, museum exhibitions, television stations, music, films, and theatrical performances, all of which require a permit from the ministry. The regime has even edited Western classics like War and Peace and Crime and Punishment by removing references to alcohol and sexuality.

The MCIG’s Press Supervisory Board, which the Obama administration also sanctioned in 2012, issues licenses for print and online media, monitors their content, and recurrently shuts down publications that flout its will. The ministry’s leader also serves on the Supreme Council of Cyberspace, the regime’s highest authority on internet policy, which routinely issues directives to monitor dissidents and ban objectionable websites. According to Mostafa Mir-salim, who led the MCIG from 1994 to 1997, journalism is “not a profession. Rather, it must be perceived as an ideological mission aimed at confronting the cultural onslaught” from the West.

Iranians who publicize their work without a license, or who publish content that offends the regime after receiving a license, frequently face imprisonment and torture. At the same time, the receipt of a license presents no guarantee of immunity. The regime habitually arrests Iranians for releasing content or conducting performances already approved by the ministry. This seemingly arbitrary persecution has fueled a culture of fear that often leads to self-censorship.

In a November 2017 interview, Golnaz Ghabraei, an Iranian literary critic and translator who fled the country in 1985, described the phenomenon vividly. “Self-censorship,” she said, “is having a sprawling Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance in your brain that consistently supervises you, your thoughts and your behavior day and the night.” Such omnipresent fear, she added, exercises a devastating psychological impact. “The more costly the price for showing your true self,” she said, “the more the true self retreats until you cannot recognize it anymore. Sometimes the true self is lost forever.”

In addition to policing the public square, the ministry aspires to strengthen support for the regime, both at home and abroad, by actively disseminating content that promotes its Islamist values. Through cultural centers and mosques throughout the world, particularly in South America, Europe, and Africa, the MCIG distributes books, film, music, and art; teaches the Persian language; conducts Quran events and competitions; and runs summer camps for youth. By posing as an innocuous educational movement, these institutions aim not only to cultivate international support for Iran’s regional agenda but also to bolster the regime’s legitimacy on the global stage.

Appointed in August 2017, Abbas Salehi has shown little indication that he will alter the MCIG’s policies. To be sure, like his boss, President Hassan Rouhani, Salehi has attempted to cultivate an image of moderation, often blaming other, seemingly more hardline clerics for the ministry’s failure to reform. In practice, Salehi’s rhetoric serves as a fig leaf for an inherently repressive government body deliberately established to facilitate censorship and advance the regime’s revolutionary agenda.

In January 2018 in the Iranian city of Isfahan, local MCIG officials prevented female members of an orchestra, led by prominent male singer Salar Aghili, from performing. The day after the show, Salehi declared that he had “no problem” with women playing on stage, but added that the ministry’s “general rules need to be followed” for now. Later that month after Mehdi Karroubi, an Iranian opposition leader under house arrest, released a public letter to President Rouhani urging him to address the demands of Iranian protestors, the MCIG prohibited state-approved media outlets from reporting about it.

Meanwhile, Salehi has made clear that he remains loyal to the regime’s brutal ideology. In February during nationwide celebrations to mark the thirty-ninth anniversary of the Islamic Revolution, the ministry released a statement noting that Salehi “had never seen such glorious marches on this occasion.” The festivities, the ministry continued, afforded Iranians an opportunity “to stand shoulder to shoulder in defending their national interests and ideals of the Revolution.” The presence of artists at the marches, the statement added, facilitates “national resistance against dangers that threaten our national dignity, and unity.”

By sanctioning Salehi, Washington can make clear that it regards Iran’s public square not as an exclusive platform for regime propaganda but as a forum for robust and unfettered dialogue. In so doing, the United States can further undermine the regime’s legitimacy, thereby expressing solidarity with the long-suffering Iranian people.

Tzvi Kahn is a senior Iran analyst at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a Washington-based nonpartisan research institute focusing on national security and foreign policy. Follow him on Twitter @TzviKahn.

Photo Credit: Abbas Salehi speaking at the Tehran International Book Fair on May 7, 2018. By Armin Karami, via Wikimedia Commons.

Enjoyed the article? Keep Providence going!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.